Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 05:12
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Epic Effort to Ground Physics in Math Opens Up the Secrets of Time - Quanta Magazine
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
If you get a chance to have sex with either Kajal Agarwal or Samantha, who would you choose and why?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why do men love boobs (irrespective of big or small)?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Which type of earbuds, wired or wireless, is better for sleep and why?
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
White House Walks Back U.S.-Built LNG Carrier Ambitions - The Maritime Executive
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Apple Unveils AI-Powered 'Workout Buddy' for Apple Watch at WWDC - MacRumors
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?